Skip to content

>Juttz Strikes Back!

12 May 2007

>Chris from Western College Hockey, a known Juttz apologist, analyzes the Jutting situation from a different point of view.

7 Comments leave one →
  1. Unknown's avatar
    12 May 2007 3:40 am

    >UGG! SO many things to say/write….but in my new effort to be nicer I’m not even going to get on my soapbox.One point though, to me he came across as a jerk about your post and that was a bit uncalled for.

  2. Unknown's avatar
    12 May 2007 5:28 pm

    >I don’t think he was being a jerk. My article is totally not his point of view, which I already knew from his response to my email.

  3. Unknown's avatar
    12 May 2007 7:20 pm

    >I am not sure what to make out of that article. I don’t think its off the mark to question a coach or his record. One could make the argument either way that Jutting is or isn’t getting the job done.

  4. Unknown's avatar
    12 May 2007 7:22 pm

    >Oh I almost forgot, I hope people will continue to still rant and rave about things. Weblogs are basically a good place for that. I hope that people that are taking a new more toned down approach still do the occasional rants about things, makes for some good reading.

  5. Unknown's avatar
    14 May 2007 12:58 am

    >Well, atleast you took it good. I guess I thought it came of as him mocking you or something of that nature. Just didn’t seem respectful to me….But it’s how you took it that matters!

  6. Unknown's avatar
    14 May 2007 2:12 am

    >I think it’s more that he wanted to show the other side of the argument, since my article was completely against what he thinks is true.But I am TRYING to think the BEST of people and you are making it SO HARD because normally I think people are jerks. It’s like offering a cigarette to someone trying to quit. :^)

  7. Unknown's avatar
    15 May 2007 6:07 pm

    >Sorry! You can’t count on ME to help you think better of people. I’m not the gal for that:)

Well?